0.12/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.13/0.16 % Command : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC 0.17/0.38 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu 0.17/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.17/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.17/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.17/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.17/0.38 % CPULimit : 1200 0.17/0.38 % WCLimit : 120 0.17/0.38 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 10:26:13 EDT 2021 0.17/0.38 % CPUTime : 0.17/0.38 % Number of cores: 8 0.17/0.38 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.25/0.39 # Version: 2.6rc1-ho 0.25/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied 0.25/0.40 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 0.40/0.61 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d 0.40/0.61 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp. 0.40/0.61 # 0.40/0.61 # Preprocessing time : 0.111 s 0.40/0.61 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.40/0.61 0.40/0.61 # Proof found! 0.40/0.61 # SZS status Theorem 0.40/0.61 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.40/0.61 thf(fact_2_infiniteExecutionCfg_Osimps_I1_J, axiom, ![X7:config256849571t_unit, X8:list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_c1059388851t_unit, X9:list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_message_p_v]:(fLPThe1519354920_p_v_s @ X7 @ X8 @ X9 @ zero_zero_nat)=(cons_c1162654829t_unit @ X7 @ nil_co1338500125t_unit), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_2_infiniteExecutionCfg_Osimps_I1_J)). 0.40/0.61 thf(fact_1_fe__def, axiom, (fe)=(fLPThe1519354920_p_v_s @ cfg @ fStepCfg @ fStepMsg), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_1_fe__def)). 0.40/0.61 thf(conj_0, conjecture, (fe @ zero_zero_nat)=(cons_c1162654829t_unit @ cfg @ nil_co1338500125t_unit), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_0)). 0.40/0.61 thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X2454:config256849571t_unit, X2455:list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_c1059388851t_unit, X2456:list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_message_p_v]:(fLPThe1519354920_p_v_s @ X2454 @ X2455 @ X2456 @ zero_zero_nat)=(cons_c1162654829t_unit @ X2454 @ nil_co1338500125t_unit), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_2_infiniteExecutionCfg_Osimps_I1_J])). 0.40/0.61 thf(c_0_4, plain, (fe)=(fLPThe1519354920_p_v_s @ cfg @ fStepCfg @ fStepMsg), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1_fe__def])). 0.40/0.61 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (fe @ zero_zero_nat)!=(cons_c1162654829t_unit @ cfg @ nil_co1338500125t_unit), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 0.40/0.61 thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X9:list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_message_p_v, X8:list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_c1059388851t_unit, X7:config256849571t_unit]:(fLPThe1519354920_p_v_s @ X7 @ X8 @ X9 @ zero_zero_nat)=(cons_c1162654829t_unit @ X7 @ nil_co1338500125t_unit), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.40/0.61 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X4:nat]:(fLPThe1519354920_p_v_s @ cfg @ fStepCfg @ fStepMsg @ X4)=(fe @ X4), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.40/0.61 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (fe @ zero_zero_nat)!=(cons_c1162654829t_unit @ cfg @ nil_co1338500125t_unit), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.40/0.61 thf(c_0_9, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7]), c_0_8]), ['proof']). 0.40/0.61 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.40/0.61 # Proof object total steps : 10 0.40/0.61 # Proof object clause steps : 5 0.40/0.61 # Proof object formula steps : 5 0.40/0.61 # Proof object conjectures : 3 0.40/0.61 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1 0.40/0.61 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2 0.40/0.61 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3 0.40/0.61 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3 0.40/0.61 # Proof object generating inferences : 1 0.40/0.61 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1 0.40/0.61 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 0.40/0.61 # Parsed axioms : 419 0.40/0.61 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.40/0.61 # Initial clauses : 1037 0.40/0.61 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 87 0.40/0.61 # Initial clauses in saturation : 950 0.40/0.61 # Processed clauses : 1192 0.40/0.61 # ...of these trivial : 11 0.40/0.61 # ...subsumed : 98 0.40/0.61 # ...remaining for further processing : 1083 0.40/0.61 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 139 0.40/0.61 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.40/0.61 # Backward-subsumed : 1 0.40/0.61 # Backward-rewritten : 1 0.40/0.61 # Generated clauses : 232 0.40/0.61 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 182 0.40/0.61 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 5 0.40/0.61 # Paramodulations : 109 0.40/0.61 # Factorizations : 3 0.40/0.61 # NegExts : 0 0.40/0.61 # Equation resolutions : 143 0.40/0.61 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.40/0.61 # Propositional check models : 0 0.40/0.61 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.40/0.61 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.40/0.61 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.40/0.61 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.40/0.61 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.40/0.61 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.40/0.61 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.40/0.61 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.40/0.61 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.40/0.61 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.40/0.61 # Current number of processed clauses : 122 0.40/0.61 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 50 0.40/0.61 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.40/0.61 # Negative unit clauses : 25 0.40/0.61 # Non-unit-clauses : 47 0.40/0.61 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 777 0.40/0.61 # ...number of literals in the above : 2747 0.40/0.61 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.40/0.61 # Current number of archived clauses : 854 0.40/0.61 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 73050 0.40/0.61 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25575 0.40/0.61 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 49 0.40/0.61 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1074 0.40/0.61 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 4 0.40/0.61 # BW rewrite match attempts : 16 0.40/0.61 # BW rewrite match successes : 1 0.40/0.61 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.40/0.61 # Condensation successes : 0 0.40/0.61 # Termbank termtop insertions : 102443 0.40/0.61 0.40/0.61 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.40/0.61 # User time : 0.215 s 0.40/0.61 # System time : 0.014 s 0.40/0.61 # Total time : 0.228 s 0.40/0.61 # Maximum resident set size: 2988 pages 0.40/0.61 EOF